Five Innovative 2012 Hybrid Cars to Avoid

May 30
16:32

2024

jodie mht

jodie mht

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Summary: While hybrid cars have made significant strides in fuel efficiency and environmental impact, not all models are created equal. In 2012, several hybrid vehicles hit the market, but some fell short of expectations. This article delves into five such models, examining their shortcomings and why they might not be the best choice for eco-conscious drivers. From lackluster fuel economy to poor driving dynamics, we explore the reasons these hybrids missed the mark.

Introduction

Hybrid cars have revolutionized the automotive industry,Five Innovative 2012 Hybrid Cars to Avoid Articles offering a blend of fuel efficiency and reduced emissions. However, not all hybrids are created equal. In 2012, several hybrid models were introduced, but some failed to live up to the hype. This article examines five such models, highlighting their shortcomings and why they might not be the best choice for eco-conscious drivers.

1. BMW ActiveHybrid 7

Overview

The BMW ActiveHybrid 7 was one of BMW's early attempts at hybrid technology. Unfortunately, it fell short in several key areas.

Performance and Fuel Economy

  • Engine: 4.4-liter twin-turbo V8
  • Electric Motor: 15-kilowatt
  • Combined EPA Rating: 20 mpg

Despite BMW's claims of superior performance, the ActiveHybrid 7 offered a combined EPA rating of just 20 mpg, no better than the non-hybrid 740Li model of the same year. The hybrid system was more focused on enhancing power rather than improving fuel efficiency.

Driving Experience

The car's driving dynamics were also disappointing. The hybrid system added significant weight, making the vehicle feel sluggish, especially at lower speeds. The transition between electric and gasoline power was not smooth, leading to a jerky driving experience.

Updates and Changes

For 2013, BMW updated the ActiveHybrid 7 with a more efficient 40-kW motor and a twin-turbo six-cylinder engine. However, these updates did little to improve the overall driving experience or fuel economy.

2. Honda CR-Z

Overview

The Honda CR-Z was marketed as a sporty hybrid, reminiscent of the popular CRX. However, it failed to deliver on both performance and fuel efficiency.

Performance and Fuel Economy

  • Engine: 1.5-liter i-VTEC
  • Electric Motor: Integrated Motor Assist (IMA)
  • Combined EPA Rating: 37 mpg

The CR-Z's hybrid system and additional weight made it neither particularly fast nor fuel-efficient. With a combined EPA rating of 37 mpg, it fell short of expectations for a hybrid vehicle.

Driving Experience

The CR-Z's driving dynamics were also underwhelming. It lacked the agility and sportiness of the CRX, making it a poor choice for those seeking a fun-to-drive hybrid.

3. Lexus HS 250h

Overview

The Lexus HS 250h was introduced as a luxury hybrid sedan. However, it struggled to find its niche in the market.

Performance and Fuel Economy

  • Engine: 2.4-liter inline-4
  • Electric Motor: Hybrid Synergy Drive
  • Combined EPA Rating: 35 mpg

The HS 250h offered a combined EPA rating of 35 mpg, which was decent but not exceptional for a hybrid. Its performance was also lackluster, with a 0-60 mph time of around 8.4 seconds.

Driving Experience

The HS 250h's driving experience was uninspiring. It lacked the refinement and luxury expected from a Lexus, making it a less attractive option for luxury hybrid buyers.

4. Chevrolet Malibu Eco

Overview

The Chevrolet Malibu Eco was GM's attempt to offer a fuel-efficient midsize sedan. However, it fell short in several areas.

Performance and Fuel Economy

  • Engine: 2.4-liter inline-4
  • Electric Motor: eAssist
  • Combined EPA Rating: 29 mpg

The Malibu Eco's combined EPA rating of 29 mpg was disappointing for a hybrid. Its performance was also underwhelming, with a 0-60 mph time of around 8.7 seconds.

Driving Experience

The Malibu Eco's driving dynamics were also lackluster. It lacked the smoothness and refinement expected from a hybrid, making it a less appealing option for eco-conscious drivers.

5. Infiniti M35h

Overview

The Infiniti M35h was introduced as a performance-oriented hybrid sedan. However, it struggled to balance performance and fuel efficiency.

Performance and Fuel Economy

  • Engine: 3.5-liter V6
  • Electric Motor: 50-kilowatt
  • Combined EPA Rating: 29 mpg

The M35h offered a combined EPA rating of 29 mpg, which was decent but not exceptional for a hybrid. Its performance was impressive, with a 0-60 mph time of around 5.2 seconds, but this came at the expense of fuel efficiency.

Driving Experience

The M35h's driving experience was a mixed bag. While it offered strong performance, it lacked the smoothness and refinement expected from a luxury hybrid, making it a less attractive option for those seeking a balance of performance and efficiency.

Conclusion

While hybrid technology has come a long way, not all models are created equal. The BMW ActiveHybrid 7, Honda CR-Z, Lexus HS 250h, Chevrolet Malibu Eco, and Infiniti M35h all fell short in various areas, making them less appealing options for eco-conscious drivers. As hybrid technology continues to evolve, it's essential to carefully consider the pros and cons of each model before making a purchase.

Interesting Stats

  • Global Hybrid Sales: As of 2021, over 17 million hybrid vehicles have been sold worldwide, with Toyota accounting for more than 15 million of those sales. Source: Toyota Global Newsroom
  • Fuel Efficiency Standards: The Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards in the U.S. require automakers to achieve an average fuel economy of 54.5 mpg by 2025. Source: U.S. Department of Transportation

References

By understanding the limitations of these 2012 hybrid models, consumers can make more informed decisions and choose vehicles that truly offer the benefits of hybrid technology.