Six New 2013 Cars to Avoid

May 30
16:30

2024

adawong1

adawong1

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

In the ever-evolving world of automobiles, 2013 brought a slew of new models, but not all of them were hits. Some vehicles, despite their innovative features, fell short in various aspects. This article delves into six such cars from 2013 that you might want to think twice about before purchasing. We'll explore their shortcomings, compare them with competitors, and provide detailed insights backed by data and statistics.

Summary

In 2013,Six New 2013 Cars to Avoid Articles several new car models hit the market, but not all lived up to expectations. This article highlights six such vehicles, examining their drawbacks, comparing them with competitors, and providing detailed insights backed by data. From hybrid cars with disappointing fuel efficiency to subcompact hatchbacks that failed to meet sales goals, we cover it all. Read on to discover which 2013 cars you might want to avoid and why.

1. Honda Insight

Overview

The Honda Insight, a subcompact hybrid hatchback, was introduced as Honda's answer to the Toyota Prius. Despite its similar appearance to the Prius, the Insight's mild-hybrid system didn't deliver comparable fuel efficiency.

Fuel Efficiency

  • 2012 Insight Combined EPA Rating: 42 mpg
  • 2013 Insight Combined EPA Rating: 42 mpg

While the 2013 Insight saw some updates, its fuel efficiency remained the same as the previous model year. In comparison, the Toyota Prius boasted a combined EPA rating of 50 mpg, making it a more fuel-efficient choice.

Competitor Comparison

  • Honda Fit: Priced over $3,000 less than the Insight, the Fit offered a combined fuel efficiency of 31 mpg with a five-speed automatic transmission. It also provided more space and versatility, making it a more practical choice for many buyers.

Sales Performance

The Insight struggled to meet its sales targets, with many buyers opting for the more spacious and fuel-efficient Prius or the versatile Honda Fit.

2. Honda CR-Z

Overview

The Honda CR-Z, a two-seater hybrid sports car, aimed to combine sporty performance with fuel efficiency. However, it fell short in both areas.

Transmission Options

  • Manual Transmission: The CR-Z was the only hybrid available with a six-speed manual transmission.
  • Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT): Offered better fuel efficiency at 38 mpg combined, compared to 34 mpg combined for the manual version.

Practicality

As a two-seater, the CR-Z was a niche vehicle with limited practicality. Its fuel efficiency was also not exceptional, making it less appealing to buyers looking for a practical and efficient hybrid.

3. Lexus HS 250h

Overview

The Lexus HS 250h, introduced as a 2010 model, was the first dedicated Lexus hybrid. However, it failed to make a significant impact in the market.

Sales Performance

The HS 250h did not meet its sales goals and was discontinued after the 2012 model year. It was effectively replaced by the all-new 2013 Lexus ES 300h, a mid-size luxury sedan.

Competitor Comparison

  • Toyota Prius: As another dedicated hybrid, the Prius offered better fuel efficiency and a more spacious interior, making it a more attractive option for buyers.

4. Chevrolet Volt

Overview

The Chevrolet Volt, a plug-in hybrid, aimed to offer the best of both worlds: electric driving with the convenience of a gasoline engine. However, it faced several challenges.

Electric Range

  • 2013 Volt Electric Range: 38 miles

While the Volt's electric range was decent, it fell short compared to newer electric vehicles entering the market. Additionally, its high price tag made it less appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

Competitor Comparison

  • Nissan Leaf: As a fully electric vehicle, the Leaf offered a similar range at a lower price point, making it a more attractive option for those looking to go electric.

5. Nissan Juke

Overview

The Nissan Juke, a subcompact crossover, stood out with its unique design. However, its quirky appearance wasn't enough to make up for its shortcomings.

Interior Space

The Juke's interior was cramped, with limited rear-seat and cargo space. This made it less practical for families or those needing more room.

Competitor Comparison

  • Honda HR-V: Offered more interior space and versatility, making it a more practical choice for buyers in the subcompact crossover segment.

6. Mitsubishi i-MiEV

Overview

The Mitsubishi i-MiEV, an all-electric vehicle, aimed to offer an affordable entry into the electric car market. However, it struggled to compete with other electric vehicles.

Electric Range

  • 2013 i-MiEV Electric Range: 62 miles

The i-MiEV's limited range made it less practical for many buyers, especially when compared to competitors offering longer ranges.

Competitor Comparison

  • Chevrolet Spark EV: Offered a longer range and better performance, making it a more attractive option for those looking for an affordable electric vehicle.

Conclusion

While 2013 brought several new car models to the market, not all of them lived up to expectations. From hybrids with disappointing fuel efficiency to electric vehicles with limited range, these six cars had their share of shortcomings. By considering these factors and comparing them with competitors, buyers can make more informed decisions when choosing their next vehicle.

For more detailed information on car models and their performance, you can visit Edmunds and Consumer Reports.

Interesting Stats

  • Hybrid Car Sales: In 2013, hybrid car sales in the U.S. accounted for 3.19% of the total market, with the Toyota Prius leading the pack (Source: Statista).
  • Electric Vehicle Range: The average range of electric vehicles in 2013 was around 76 miles, highlighting the limited range of early electric cars (Source: U.S. Department of Energy).

By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of these 2013 models, you can make a more informed decision and avoid potential pitfalls.

Article "tagged" as:

Categories: