Lawsuit Filed Against Ford for Misleading Fuel Economy Claims

May 30
19:33

2024

Paul E Lee

Paul E Lee

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Two California law firms are joining forces to sue Ford Motor Company, alleging that the automaker exaggerated fuel economy claims by up to 10 miles per gallon. This article delves into the specifics of the lawsuit, the affected vehicles, and the broader implications for the automotive industry.

Summary

Two California-based law firms are consolidating lawsuits against Ford Motor Company,Lawsuit Filed Against Ford for Misleading Fuel Economy Claims Articles accusing the automaker of overstating fuel economy claims for its 2013 C-Max Hybrid and Fusion Hybrid models by as much as 10 miles per gallon. The firms, McCuneWright and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, are seeking punitive damages for what they describe as "false and misleading" marketing campaigns. The lawsuit could have significant repercussions for Ford and the automotive industry as a whole.

The Allegations

Consolidation of Lawsuits

Two prominent California law firms, McCuneWright and Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd, are consolidating multiple lawsuits against Ford Motor Company. The lawsuits allege that Ford conducted "false and misleading" marketing campaigns for its 2013 C-Max Hybrid and Fusion Hybrid vehicles. The firms are seeking punitive damages due to the overinflated fuel economy estimates provided by Ford.

Class-Action Representatives

The consolidated lawsuit will now include five to ten class-action representatives from various parts of the United States. These representatives have reported significantly lower fuel economy ratings than those advertised by Ford. According to Rich McCune, a partner at McCuneWright, the firm has received hundreds of calls from hybrid vehicle owners across the country who are dissatisfied with their vehicles' fuel economy.

The First Lawsuit

Richard Pitkin's Case

The first lawsuit against Ford was filed by Richard Pitkin, a resident of Roseville, California. Pitkin purchased a C-Max Hybrid in October of the previous year, expecting to achieve the advertised 47 miles per gallon (mpg) rating published by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). However, his vehicle only managed to achieve 37 mpg. Consumer Reports later confirmed Pitkin's findings, with their test vehicle also falling 10 mpg short of the advertised figure.

Consumer Reports Findings

Consumer Reports tested both the C-Max Hybrid and the Fusion Hybrid. The C-Max Hybrid achieved 37 mpg, while the Fusion Hybrid managed 35 mpg in the city and 41 mpg on the highway, compared to the advertised 47 mpg overall. These findings further substantiated the claims made in the lawsuits.

Ford's Response

EPA Review

In response to the lawsuits, the EPA announced in December that it would review Ford's fuel economy claims and make appropriate adjustments if necessary. This review could lead to changes in the advertised fuel economy ratings for the affected vehicles.

Ford's Statement

Ford issued a statement in response to the pending lawsuits, asserting that vehicle owners have a choice in how they drive their vehicles. According to Ford, driving styles can significantly impact fuel economy. The company suggested that owners experiencing reduced mpg totals might be driving more aggressively, which naturally reduces mileage below the optimal estimates.

Industry Implications

Previous Lawsuits

Ford is not the first automaker to face lawsuits over fuel economy claims. Hyundai and Kia recently settled a class-action lawsuit alleging that many of their vehicles featured exaggerated fuel economy claims. The Korean automaker agreed to offer payouts to every owner who incurred higher fuel costs than anticipated.

Impact on Car Buyers

Fuel economy has become a crucial factor for new car buyers in recent years. Inflated or exaggerated fuel economy numbers can significantly damage a car maker's reputation. The outcome of the lawsuit against Ford could have far-reaching implications, potentially affecting consumer trust and the company's market position.

Interesting Stats

  • According to a 2020 study by the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), real-world fuel consumption for passenger cars is, on average, 39% higher than the official test results. Source
  • A 2019 survey by AAA found that 30% of U.S. drivers consider fuel economy the most important factor when purchasing a new vehicle. Source

Conclusion

The consolidated lawsuit against Ford for overstated fuel economy claims highlights the importance of accurate marketing in the automotive industry. As the case progresses, it could set a precedent for how fuel economy claims are regulated and enforced, impacting both automakers and consumers.

This article provides a comprehensive overview of the lawsuit against Ford, including the allegations, responses, and broader industry implications. For more information on fuel economy and automotive regulations, visit the EPA's official website.