On October 4, 2005, the IRS issued proposed regulations for Section 409A of Code. The proposed regulations are intended to further explain how Section 409A applies to various compensatory arrangements, including stock options granted by private companies.
Does Section 409A apply to private company stock options?
Incentive Stock Options are exempt from Section 409A. Nonqualified Stock Options are exempt from Section 409A if the following requirements are met:
Are incentive stock options subject to Section 409A?
Although Section 409A exempts incentive stock options, this exemption does not apply if an amendment disqualifies the incentive stock option. Additionally, if it is determined that the fair market value of the option price is greater than the strike price at the date of grant, the option will not be exempted from 409A. Therefore, the steps necessary for valuing a nonqualified stock option are also applicable to incentive stock options.
Are any nonqualified stock options grandfathered from Section 409A?
Yes. Stock options are grandfathered from Section 409A if the option was vested before January 1, 2005. The exemption will end if the stock option is materially modified after October 3, 2004.
Are Limited Liability Company units subject to Section 409A?
Yes. Grants of partnership interest, options and appreciation rights in partnership interests are treated in the same manner as grants of corporate stock, stock options or SAR’s. (IRS Notice 2005-1)
As a private company, how do we determine the fair market value of our common stock for purposes of these rules?
The proposed regulations state that for the IRS to accept a valuation of private company common stock, it must be done by “the reasonable application of any reasonable valuation method.” Factors that the IRS states should be considered in the valuation in order for the valuation method to be reasonable include:
The value must be determined taking into consideration all available information material to the value of the corporation, and must be calculated as of a date that is within 12 months of the date for which the valuation is being used.
Are there any valuation methods that will be presumed to be reasonable?
Yes. While the foregoing “facts and circumstances” standard raises uncertainty, the proposed regulations provide three specific methods that the IRS will presume to be reasonable if consistently applied: (1) an appraisal by an independent appraiser as of a date that is within 12 months of the date for which the value is being determined; (2) a valuation of illiquid stock of a start up company by experienced personnel and (3) a valuation based upon certain types of formulas.
What is the “start up” valuation method?
To qualify as “illiquid stock” of a “start-up” company under the proposed regulations, the following requirements must be met:
The person(s) performing the valuation of a “start-up” company must have significant knowledge and experience or training in performing similar valuations. They may be employees or directors of the company. In many instances, it would appear that a board of directors or a committee of the board of directors of the start up company may do the valuation, where the board or committee is composed of experienced venture capitalists or private equity investors that have significant experience in valuing start up companies.
What is the “formula-based” valuation method?
A formula-based valuation also will be presumed to be a reasonable valuation method if certain requirements are met. Examples of the formula-based valuation method would be valuing the stock based on a multiple of sales or earnings, or book value. However, for a formula-based valuation to qualify under the proposed regulations, it must be consistently applied to all valuations of the stock. For example, the formula value would have to be used for issuances to and repurchases by the company from third parties and non-employees as well as for regulatory filings and loan covenants. This appears to be a very restrictive method and we do not anticipate many companies will be willing and able to qualify for this method.
How long will a valuation be valid?
All valuations under any of these methods are valid until the earlier of (i) 12 months from the valuation date or (ii) a material change in the value of the company. Any method used must be applied consistently for all valuations.
How do these rules apply to stock options granted before January 1, 2005?
In the proposed regulations, Section 409A applies to all stock options that were not vested prior to January 1, 2005. No distinction is made based on the grant date of the option. However, on December 23, 2005, the IRS issued Notice 2006-4 which provides interim guidance with respect to the application of the new rules for non-qualified deferred compensation under Section 409A to stock options granted by private companies. The guidance provides transitional relief for private company stock options and the determination of fair market value and is welcome news to private companies.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Valuation Issues Q&A
ESOPs have become an effective tool in corporate finance and tax planning. Not only do they provide retirement benefits and incentives to employees but an ESOP can provide unique ways to transition company management in tax favored environments. An ESOP can even be used to increase cash flow or convert debt to a pre-tax environment.The Importance of an Independent Valuation
Not only is an independent valuation a good idea when getting involved in a transaction, it is also a statutory requirement in many circumstances that involve Employee Stock Ownership Plans, Estate/Gift Taxes, Charitable Contributions or, most recently, the granting of Stock Options.409A Valuation Update: Private Companies and Stock Options
Since the IRS issued Notice 2006-4 on December 23, 2005 many companies feel that they have continued flexibility in determining fair market value for stock option grant purposes and that they do not need to take action until the issuance of the final regulations, expected to be January 1, 2007. Is this really the case?