In around 2003 Microsoft stated about Project Green that it will be merging several Microsoft just acquired ERPs, such as Great Plains, Solomon, Navision, Axapta into future so-called Project Green, where the best features of Great Plains (more likely financials and Payroll), Navision (Manufacturing), Solomon (Project Organization or project Accounting)
In 2005 Microsoft Business Solutions was renamed into Microsoft Dynamics and its participating ERP/CRM were also renamed respectively into GP (Great Plains), SL (Solomon), NAV (Navision), AX (Axapta) and Microsoft Dynamics CRM (Microsoft CRM). Since Microsoft Dynamics project was introduced we rather see the efforts to advance MS Dynamics products ERP and CRM on its native SDK: Dexterity, CSide, MorphX, MS CRM SDK, and some attempts to bring these products to .Net and especially Microsoft Office and Vista interface compliance. Where Microsoft Dynamics is heading? This is difficult question and we are not Microsoft, but rather independent journalists, so we will be giving your our opinion
Dexterity Customization for Dynamics GP Evaluation Level Paper
When you are developer it is always a good idea to read technical manuals. But if you was just assigned to the IT team to decide if Dexterity is the right tool to customize your ERP application then first you need something which is in style of ‘easy reading papers’ or FAQPlanning Dynamics GP Customization in Large Corporation
If you are reading this page then chances are high that you were not able to find ISV add-on and need customization project. Let’s talk about planning, quality assurance and future event such as version updates.Dynamics GP Invoice Logo Attributed to Specific Company or Crossing the Borders of Three SOP Forms
Initial Great Plains Dynamics architecture had three SOP Invoice forms: Long, Short and Blank. Modern GP is popular in scenarios where you have more than three companies under one business entity umbrella