Summary: A down-and-out puppeteer stumbles upon a portal that allows him to enter the mind of actor John Malkovich. This bizarre discovery sets off a series of ethical and philosophical dilemmas about identity, ownership, and the nature of the mind. The film "Being John Malkovich" delves into these questions with a mix of dark humor and intellectual rigor, challenging viewers to reconsider their assumptions about selfhood and property.
A struggling puppeteer, Craig Schwartz, finds himself employed at a peculiar office located on the 7½ floor of a building, where the ceiling is barely a meter high. This surreal setting is reminiscent of Lewis Carroll's "Alice in Wonderland" illustrations. By sheer accident, Craig discovers a hidden tunnel that acts as a portal into the mind of the renowned actor John Malkovich. This portal allows anyone who enters it to experience life through Malkovich's eyes for 15 minutes before being ejected onto the side of the New Jersey Turnpike.
The film raises profound questions about identity, ownership, and the nature of the self. One pivotal scene features John Malkovich, played by himself, confronting Craig about the exploitation of the portal. Malkovich exclaims, "It is MY brain," to which Craig retorts, "But, it was I who discovered the portal. It is my livelihood."
This exchange encapsulates several ethical dilemmas:
The concept of property rights concerning the human body is complex. For instance, selling organs like kidneys is illegal, and there are restrictions on drug use and abortion. However, intellectual property rights are well-established, allowing individuals to own the products of their brain activity, such as books, paintings, and inventions.
Intellectual property is essentially a record of brain activity. A book or a painting is a manifestation of brain waves. Yet, while we can own these products, we do not have full ownership of the brain itself. This paradox raises questions about the nature of ownership and the rights we have over our own minds.
Some scholars argue that exclusivity and scarcity are prerequisites for property rights. However, these characteristics alone do not justify ownership. For example, if someone had a cure for AIDS or cancer memorized and refused to share it, society might feel justified in accessing that information for the greater good.
The film also touches on the age-old philosophical debate of dualism—the idea that the mind and body are separate entities. The portal leads to Malkovich's mind, but he refers to it as his brain. This raises questions about whether the mind can be owned or patented. If the mind's nature is still a mystery, how can it be subject to laws and rights?
If Malkovich is unaware of the portal's visitors, can he claim trespassing? Can he prove that the portal leads to his mind? These questions highlight the complexities of establishing property rights over something as intangible as the mind.
The film takes a darker turn when Craig, unable to resist his urges, manipulates and eventually takes over Malkovich's body. This act of possession is clearly immoral, stripping the film of its intellectual ambiguity and reducing it to a more conventional narrative.
"Being John Malkovich" is a thought-provoking film that challenges viewers to reconsider their assumptions about identity, ownership, and the nature of the mind. It raises ethical and philosophical questions that remain relevant in today's world, especially as technology continues to blur the lines between the physical and the mental.
By exploring these themes, "Being John Malkovich" offers a unique lens through which to examine the complexities of human identity and the ethical implications of ownership.
The Ubiquitous Britannica 2015
Encyclopedia Britannica is now online and as a DVD. The print edition has been discontinued.
Pears Cyclopaedia 2014-5 Edition: Human Knowledge Encapsulated
Pears Cyclopaedia is the last remaining one volume reference work.
Envy as the Foundation of Capitalism
Envy is either destructive, or, as in the case of capitalism, constructive.
