Summary: William Shakespeare is celebrated worldwide for his timeless plays and sonnets, but a lingering question remains: Did he truly write them? This article delves into the Shakespeare authorship debate, exploring various theories and presenting evidence that challenges the traditional view. From Edward de Vere to Sir Francis Bacon, we examine the candidates who some believe are the real authors behind Shakespeare's works. Discover the intriguing arguments and lesser-known facts that fuel this centuries-old controversy.
William Shakespeare's name is synonymous with literary genius. His plays and sonnets have captivated audiences for centuries, inspiring countless adaptations and scholarly studies. However, a persistent question shadows his legacy: Did Shakespeare truly write the works attributed to him? This debate, known as the Shakespeare authorship question, has intrigued scholars and enthusiasts alike for over a century.
The mainstream belief is that William Shakespeare, born in Stratford-upon-Avon in 1564, is the true author of the plays and sonnets. Shakespeare of Stratford moved to London, became an actor, and co-owned an acting company. His works were published posthumously in the First Folio of 1623, solidifying his reputation as a literary giant.
Critics of the traditional view, known as anti-Stratfordians, argue that the evidence supporting Shakespeare of Stratford is insufficient. They question the lack of biographical information and suggest that the name "Shakespeare" was a pseudonym.
A significant point of contention is the "1604 problem." Many researchers believe the true author died in or before 1604, as the publication of new Shakespeare plays ceased around this time. The 1609 publication of Shake-speares Sonnets refers to the "ever-living Poet," suggesting the author was deceased by then (Anderson, 400-405).
Edward de Vere is a leading candidate among anti-Stratfordians. The Oxfordian theory, first proposed by J. Thomas Looney in 1920, suggests de Vere's biography aligns with events in Shakespeare's works. De Vere's known talent as a poet also supports this theory (Ogburn, 172-174).
Before de Vere, Sir Francis Bacon was the primary candidate. Bacon was a scientist, philosopher, and writer, and some believe he collaborated with others to write the plays. Similarities between Bacon's notes and Shakespeare's works, as well as a letter in which Bacon calls himself a "concealed poet," bolster this theory (Michell, 259-259).
Other less popular candidates include:
The First Folio, published in 1623, is a cornerstone of the authorship debate. The engraving of Shakespeare's face, attributed to Martin Droeshout, raises questions. Droeshout was only 14 when Shakespeare died, leading some to doubt he knew the playwright personally (Ogburn).
Shakespeare's works are renowned for their complexity and vast vocabulary. Anti-Stratfordians argue that Shakespeare of Stratford, with no known higher education, could not have written such sophisticated plays. Mainstream scholars counter that many Renaissance playwrights wrote about the nobility despite their modest backgrounds (Bate).
The Shakespeare authorship question remains unresolved, with compelling arguments on both sides. While mainstream scholars uphold Shakespeare of Stratford as the true author, alternative theories continue to gain traction. Regardless of the true authorship, Shakespeare's works endure as masterpieces of literature, celebrated for their depth and beauty.
For further reading, explore the Shakespeare Authorship Coalition and the Folger Shakespeare Library.
Sources:
Overview of Personal Finance Accounting
Having an understand of finance accounting will greatly help you when it comes to all of your accountant services. Know the facts on how money and accounting are affecting both personal finances and business.Intro to SEO
In order to have the most success in search engine optimization, it is crucial fro you to first understand the basics.How To Find A Good Answering Service
When looking for an answering service, there is a lot to consider. Be sure not to leave out anything important.