The "plot" and that's the only way to describe it is to bamboozle people into believing there is a real problem with Social Security that requires reducing benefits to solve it.
By Richard E Walrath and Patricia L Johnson
David Broder, who writes for the Washington Post, recently had a column about Social Security. If you can find it, it's worth a look--not for what it says, but for what it fails to say. As Broder gets older, he loses more and more of his marbles.
"A Hearing the Candidates Should Attend"by David Broder is filled with everything anyone ever wanted to know, except the basic question - why. Why is the Social Security program in trouble?
In the following statement Broder fails to provide a clear picture of the problem "unless ways are found to reform the financing and benefits of Social Security and Medicare, the demands imposed by the retirement of millions of baby boomers will consume the federal budget and blight the prospects of the next generations."
We didn't just wake up one fine morning and say "Oops... there is no more money in the kitty" that's not how government works, so what went wrong, why is Social Security in trouble? The answer is Social Security isn't in trouble, Medicare is - and lumping Social Security and Medicare together is wrong, they are two separate programs.
Social Security benefits are paid through payroll taxes. Employers and Employees each pay 6.2% of wages, up to a maximum (2008 will be $108,000), while self employed individuals pay 12.4%.
In 2006, 84% of Social Security benefits came from payroll taxes, with 14% coming from interest earnings, and 2% from taxes on Social Security benefits.
The 2007 OASDI Trustees Report states " Social Security's combined trust funds are projected to allow full payment of scheduled benefits until they become exhausted in 2041"
The report continues "... financial adequacy of the program for the next 75 years could be restored if increases were made equivalent to increasing the Social Security payroll tax immediately and permanently from its current level of 12.4 percent (for employees and employers combined) to 14.35 percent."
In other words, the Social Security deficit over a 75-year period is no more than 1.95 percent of taxable payroll wages, not exactly a financial crisis.
Medicare presents a different problem. In 2008 the first 'baby boomer' becomes eligible for early Social Security benefits at age 62, she recently applied for benefits online, but her benefits do not actually begin until January of 2008. Three years later, at age 65, this person will become eligible for Medicare and over the next two decades 78 million more Americans will become eligible for Social Security and subsequent Medicare benefits.
The problems facing Medicare are as follows:
During a CBS 60 Minutes interview, David M Walker, Comptroller General of the United States made the following statement about the 2003 Medicare prescription drug plan " The prescription drug bill was probably the most fiscally irresponsible piece of legislation since the 1960s,"
David Walker, as chief accountability officer of the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) and former Public Trustee for Social Security and Medicare from 1990 to 1995, is definitely someone 'in the know' when it comes to the status of Social Security and Medicare.
His following comment says all there is to say about the subject: "With one stroke of the pen, Walker says, the federal government increased existing Medicare obligations nearly 40 percent over the next 75 years."
This administration did not err in providing prescription drug coverage to senior citizens and the disabled; their error was in not negotiating lower prescription and medical costs prior to implementing the program.
The "plot" and that's the only way to describe it is to bamboozle people into believing there is a real problem with Social Security that requires reducing benefits to solve it.
But, even more, the "plotters" want to get this done BEFORE the time comes when the Social Security pay-out is more than the pay-in.
Why is this so important to the "plotters?"
Three reasons:
Guess who the "plotters" are in this scheme of things?
Should Limits Be Placed on the Number of Organ Transplants an Individual Receives in their Lifetime?
There are too many individuals in this country that need organ transplants for the court to basically play “God” and decide who is going to be provided with the opportunity to live and who isn't.Understanding the Effects of Natural and Man-made Disasters on Unemployment and GDP
Historically, economic damage cost-to-date in the US is around $6 billion dollars from a combination of winter storms, crop losses, spring flooding and severe weather. According to NCDC at NOAA, the economic damage costs for the period from January 1, 2011 through May 2011 are already $32 billion dollars, representing an increase of over 533 percent.The Facts Tell the Real Story on Deficit
Summary: Delve into the intricate relationship between tax policies and national deficits. This article explores the controversial statements by Senators Jon Kyl and Mitch McConnell regarding tax cuts and their impact on the deficit, contrasting their views with factual data from government reports and economic analyses. Understand the real effects of tax legislation on America's financial health.