Does Clean Mean Extreme Green?

Apr 20
07:34

2005

Bill Knell

Bill Knell

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Growing up in the suburbs of New York City in the 1960s was a pleasurable experience. Venturing into New York City, especially Manhattan, was not. The smell of car, truck and bus exhaust combined with a number of other foul vapors to produce a pollution mix that almost seemed toxic. If you were used to it, the city air was probably something that you were able to tolerate. However, to those who spent more time out of the city then in it, the air was filthy and made you sick.

mediaimage

By the late 1970s,Does Clean Mean Extreme Green? Articles the air quality in Manhattan and the other Boroughs improved substantially. There were a number of reasons for this including clean air initiatives and vehicle emission reductions. The city was also a much cleaner place. Concerns about pollution and living in a better environment caused people to clean up their neighborhoods. Dumping of materials into waterways was more tightly regulated or stopped altogether. Antiquated garbage and environmental facilities operated by New York City were updated or completely rebuilt. Anti-littering campaigns made us all think twice before throwing garbage on the street.

The cleaning up of New York City was not an isolated incident. Cities and towns throughout the United States became aware that a large part of their image and identity depended on how clean they were. However, this is not a new phenomenon. Whenever public health has been threatened by a lack of good environmental practices, there have been clean ups. Most large cities throughout the world have made sincere efforts to clean up their streets, waterways and neighborhoods. Municipal facilities that have to do with the environment have been updated.

As we began to take a closer look at the environment, it became obvious that good stewardship of our planet produced positive consequences. By replanting forests that were cut down, we insured a future supply of lumber and made sure that those areas were not impacted in a negative way. When limitations were placed on fishing in various areas, the future catch and survival of creatures necessary to those eco systems were guaranteed. Artificial products were combined with natural materials to produce superior textiles that were less expensive and eco friendly. The government limited the use of dangerous chemical pesticides which posed a threat to everything.

Despite all the positive results from a world of people who became more environmentally conscience, something went wrong. The movement to clean up the earth and be good eco stewards changed. It became a screaming protest against disturbing the world in any way. Things like logging, use of animals for food or clothes and drilling for oil were no longer going to be tolerated. Environmentalists wanted to put an end to human domination of the planet. The old enemy was large corporations that saved their bottom line at the cost of the cleanliness and safety of communities where they operated factories. The new enemy is us!

The environmental movement now insists that we leave the Earth alone. If we take them at their most radical, we should all just kill ourselves and make sure animals are around to eat what’s left of our decaying flesh. There’s just no other way to look at it. No matter where we try and cut trees, drill for oil, pump gas out of the ground or build homes, we are in the wrong.

There is a difference between being good stewards of our environment and abandoning it. People are here to stay and we all need places to live, ways to get around and things to eat. Learning from past mistakes, we now produce less pollution and live in a cleaner environment. We use items that place less of a strain on earth resources. We have even found ways to help save other living things that were disappearing on their own from our world. By cutting forests, we forestall inevitable fires, save wildlife and gain a needed source of lumber.

Green Extremists are not environmentalists. They are self-hating humans who feel we a plague on the planet. People have not always been wise in the way they have dealt with the environment, however they may also be the world’s best hope. Many scientists tell us that without people and the natural progression of their development, the world would fall into an environmental stalemate. If dinosaurs were around today, most people would do everything possible to save such rare and exotic animals from extinction.

Humans have always been fascinated with animals. President Teddy Roosevelt was a hunter, but he also saw the need to protect wild animals and the environment. He did this by creating refuges and special areas that were protected by the federal government against overuse or abuse by people. In short, Roosevelt was a sensible environmentalist. He helped create a way for humans, animals and nature to co-exist. Today’s extreme green fanatics could and should take a lesson from Teddy.

Article "tagged" as:

Categories:

Also From This Author

The Disconnect Between Hollywood and Traditional Values: A Box Office Analysis

The Disconnect Between Hollywood and Traditional Values: A Box Office Analysis

Hollywood's recent trend of producing films with liberal themes and outspoken actors has led to a noticeable decline in box office sales. This article explores the potential reasons behind this slump, examining whether Hollywood's departure from traditional values is alienating its audience. We delve into the statistics, provide nuanced insights, and cite authoritative sources to present a comprehensive analysis.
Will Area 51 Be The Next Big Tourist Attraction?

Will Area 51 Be The Next Big Tourist Attraction?

Imagine the look on my face when I heard that Area 51 might be the next Kennedy Space Center or Air Force Museum? Both the Space Center and Air Force Museum are two of the most popular, yet least publicized attractions in the USA. Boasting an amazing array of exhibits, aircraft, spacecraft and Imax presentations, these tourist destinations are home to some of our greatest national treasures. However, could they even hold a candle to the popularity of Area 51 as a tourist destination if it were opened to the public?
War of the Worlds: Fact vs. Fiction

War of the Worlds: Fact vs. Fiction

Summary: "War of the Worlds" immerses viewers in a gripping sci-fi narrative that blurs the lines between reality and fiction. Unlike other films set in distant futures or alien worlds, this movie unfolds in our familiar environment, making the experience all the more intense. This article delves into the impact of "War of the Worlds" on the sci-fi genre, its box office potential, and its influence on public perception of UFOs and extraterrestrial life.