Effective team management is more nuanced than it may initially appear. While managers often invest considerable effort into fostering teamwork, it's crucial to discern when such efforts are truly warranted. Understanding the dynamics of team performance involves recognizing the distinction between a group of individuals working alongside each other and a cohesive team striving towards a shared objective. This article delves into the two critical dimensions of managing team performance: identifying genuine teamwork and establishing performance standards.
John, a seasoned manager, faces a perplexing challenge. Despite his fair and competent management style, his sales team's collective performance remains subpar. Individual achievements have improved, yet the essence of teamwork eludes them. The crux of the issue lies in the absence of a shared goal—a defining characteristic of a true team.
Consider the sports of cricket and baseball. Despite their differences, both require genuine teamwork, as each player contributes to a common objective: scoring runs and limiting the opposition. Every player must possess basic skills, such as batting and fielding, while specialists like pitchers and catchers in baseball or bowlers and wicketkeepers in cricket elevate the team's performance. Success hinges on the confidence that each member will competently fulfill their role.
John's sales group lacked this interconnectedness. Each member could perform independently without relying on others, indicating that John was managing a group, not a team. Recognizing this, John could shift his focus from trying to force teamwork to enhancing individual performance and cooperation.
Once you've ascertained that your group shares a common goal, the next step is to set performance standards for both individuals and the team. These standards should encompass:
Performance measures should be clear, quantifiable, and prioritized to convey their relative importance to team members.
To develop team performance standards, involve the team in a collaborative session. Each member should consider the team's composition, objectives, methods, challenges, current performance, and suggest performance standards. Reaching consensus on these elements ensures that everyone is aligned and committed to the team's success.
At the heart of these strategies is the principle that both team and individual performance can be enhanced when expectations are transparent and agreed upon. For managers like John, this approach allows for a more targeted focus on individual performance and cooperation, without the undue pressure of cultivating teamwork where it may not be naturally present.
While the article provides a framework for team management, it's worth noting some compelling statistics that underscore the importance of effective team performance:
These statistics highlight the tangible benefits of cultivating genuine teamwork and the potential pitfalls of neglecting team dynamics. By understanding and applying the two critical dimensions of team performance management, leaders can unlock the full potential of their teams.
Service is the key to survival in today's climate
It's been said that your first time customer, even your first time visitor (say to your website) is always the highest cost to you. But it's the repeat customers and visitors that really provide the best returns.
Are you a Leader or Manager?
Is there a difference between a leader and a manager? Can you be both? Do you need to be both?
Tough times call for tough training
Training takes time and money - two resources that are in short supply at the moment. Here's a suggestion that may help reduce costs and at the same time, improve the bottom line.
