Generally people in corporate see and define truth in different ways as they perceive one truth and ......
Existential and experiential truths, the definition and its consequences, every corporate and its HR must be aware of while dealing with people of different profile and responsibilities.
Most people in the corporate known to speak contradictory truths mainly due to the mismatch in their operating zone and their actual state of being. Only when the difference between ‘existential’ and ‘experiential’ truths are understood, a proper resonance between what people speak and what is true can be clearly established.
All animals are believed to have understood the distinction between the ‘existential’ and ‘experiential’ truths far clearer than man. Hence, all animals function either from the premises of ‘existential’ or ‘experiential’ truth at any given point in time. Hence they are always guided by their ‘innate intelligence’.
Contrary to the above, man is the only species always live in between the ‘existential’ and ‘experiential’ truth. Since he always opt to be in a ‘quincuncial’ (half in and half out) state, he swing either of the sides frequently. During such swing or in a state of flux, people from most corporate often speak truth as what they experience than what really exist.
In the corporate world, such confusion is very common. For most corporate employees, the definition of truth is nothing but what they experience and not what is real. Only a very sensitive HR knows how to separate the truth from the ‘ore’ of their description.
Fear of the ‘possible existence of a problem’, the corporate employees narrate and describe many things as if they are experiencing. In corporate, every one needs to sense the existential truth ideally from non-experiential zone. Such people are only called ‘sensitive’. The other group of people who knows only to experience the ‘existential’ truth and they cannot sense it by any other means. Such people often turned out to be ‘victim’ thinkers. One need to careful in reading ‘first type’ people also. Sometime they may superimpose their imagination over the ‘existential’ truth and may present the data in the most exaggerated manner.
It is not the mere understanding of what people speak, but from which domain they speak only would help one to understand the real meaning from verbose.
None of the animal exhibit ‘dualism’ like man. They are always alert with the ‘existential’ truth in the jungle ecosystem and hence are very sensitive. The existential truth makes the animals very alert and assertive in the jungle space while acceptance comes with experiential truth.
Learn the difference, teach others and together, build a successful organization.
Ref: Management Book- Jungle wisdom for corporate management – lessons from university of nature by Swami Sukhabodhananda and Dr S Ranganathan
Bamboo Business Approach: A Natural Phenomenon Mirrored in Corporate Strategies
In the realm of business, the bamboo plant offers a fascinating metaphor for certain corporate strategies. Known for its unique reproductive cycle, bamboo experiences a phenomenon called "mass flowering" where all plants in a population bloom simultaneously, set seeds, and then die. This rare event, occurring only once every several decades for some species, has intriguing parallels in the business world, particularly in marketing strategies that flood the market with products in a short burst to maximize impact and profit before receding.
When You Insist on Quality: A Strategic Message to Corporate Leaders
In today's competitive business environment, understanding the true essence of quality is crucial for corporate leaders. Quality should not merely be about consistency and uniformity but should also embrace creativity and innovation. This article explores how leaders can redefine quality standards to foster both excellence and innovation within their organizations.
Understanding the Adaptive Leadership Styles in Corporate Environments
In the dynamic world of corporate leadership, adaptability is often a necessity rather than a choice. Leaders may alter their behaviors and strategies to navigate the complex landscape of organizational politics, market conditions, and internal team dynamics. This flexibility, while sometimes perceived negatively, can be a strategic advantage, echoing survival traits found in nature.
