Sporting Integrity: What Counts As Cheating?

Aug 23
09:55

2012

Brunetti Brunetti

Brunetti Brunetti

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

Professor Chris Gale is Director of Bradford University Law School, whose programmes include the LLB Law and Graduate Diploma in Law. An expert ...

mediaimage
Professor Chris Gale is Director of Bradford University Law School,Sporting Integrity: What Counts As Cheating? Articles whose programmes include the LLB Law and Graduate Diploma in Law.  An expert in sport and law, Professor Gale looks at what counts as cheating in sport.

We are told a lot about ‘cheating’ and ‘corruption’ in sport but there is no real definition.  Do we mean something which goes over the criminal offence boundary (clearly) and/or something which is unacceptable on another, even moral level? Is it something to be judged ‘in its time’?  These are questions I ask my LLB Law students.

1. What is cheating in sport?

I was at a most interesting event hosted by FrontRow Legal at Elland Road, the home of Leeds United Football Club.  The speakers were open and thought-provoking with their views on ‘Sporting Integrity vs The Lure of Money’.  Rick Parry, former chief exec of the FA Premier League was a key speaker along with Ian Smith, legal director of the Professional Cricketers’ Association, Anthony Clavane – the Sunday Mirror sports journalist, and Alan Smart who has a security consultancy.

The point was well made that our views of cheating and corruption have changed over time.

2. Views of cheating in sport change over time

Take Leeds City Football Club which was kicked out of the Football League in 1920 for fielding non registered players in a non-competitive series of games during World War I.  It probably wouldn’t raise an eyebrow now but was clearly severely disapproved of then.

Even the 1936 abdication crisis would probably be little more than tabloid gossip now!  Where does promising a vote for, say, hosting the World Cup and then going back on the promise fit in – is it really cheating or corruption?

Gambling in sport clearly can result in cheating (arguably Pakistan’s cricket team) and this can align to corruption.  Rick Parry feels very strongly that cheating to lose is a very different phenomenon – and influenced by gambling – from cheating to win, which comes from being highly competitive.

3. Sport governing bodies must lead

Rick Parry and his committee’s report on a Sports Betting Integrity Panel concludes that every sport governing body has to have rules fit for its purpose and appropriate but proportionate disciplinary powers.  There should be a pan-sport ‘integrity unit’ and that all sports should educate participants from an early age.

The most important is education – showing young sportsmen and women the serious dangers and repercussions of cheating and training them on how to avoid pitfalls.

4. Education will change the culture of cheating

Education has the capacity to breed an ethic and responsibility that becomes a driving force.  As an example, education about drink driving and its effects has, albeit over 40 years, changed perception of drink driving from being ‘harmless’ in the main to being ‘criminal’ in the true sense of the word.  Most people now see drink driving as morally appalling behaviour rather than just a regulatory tool for the police which anyone could fall foul of.

I would certainly see education as the starting point to cleaning up much of the mess that the sports world is currently in.  But who is going to take the lead to make it happen? 

Sport and the law is an elective module on the LLB Law degree programme at Bradford University School of Management.

Professor Gale qualified as a solicitor in 1980 and moved to academia 10 years later. He joined Bradford University Law School as the inaugural Director of Legal Studies in July 2005.  His research interests include human rights, public law, especially judicial review and sport and the law. Amongst other projects, he is currently examining whether the public has confidence in the executive, particularly the court system, the police and other enforcement agencies.