The Basel II Accord introduces a specific requirement relating to the reservation of capital against operational losses. It also sets out those standards that have to be observed in the mitigation of operational risk. The words “operational risk” immediately raise a whole series of questions such as; What is “Basel II”? What is operational risk? How is the charge going to be calculated? What are the operational risk standards?
“Basel II” has been in the news an awful lot these past 18 month or so. Unlike Basel I the new standard introduces a capital charge based on operational risk. The words Operational risk themselves immediately raise a whole bunch of questions; What is “Basel II”? What is operational risk? How is the charge going to be calculated? What are the operational risk standards that banks will have to comply with?
Basel II or to use is full name “International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards” defines operational risk as “the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events”. This definition explicitly includes legal risk but excludes strategic and reputational risk.
In terms of the Basel II Accord there are three methods for calculating the capital charges for operational risk. The methods provide a range of increasing sophistication and risk sensitivity. The three approaches are:
The Basel Committee has encouraged banks to move along the range of available approaches as they develop more sophisticated operational risk measurement systems and practices.
Internationally active banks, as well as banks who have significant operational risk exposures (such as specialized processing banks) are expected to use an approach that is more sophisticated than the Basic Indicator Approach and which fits the risk profile of the institution.
A bank will not be allowed to revert to a simpler approach once it has been approved for a more advanced approach without supervisory approval. However, if a national bank supervisor determines that a bank using a more advanced approach no longer meets the qualifying criteria for this approach, it may require the bank to go back to a simpler approach for some or all of its operations, until it meets the conditions specified by the supervisor for returning to a more advanced approach.
A bank will be permitted to use the Basic Indicator or Standardized Approach for some parts of its operations and an AMA for others provided certain minimum criteria are met. The conditions under which this is permitted are;
The Basel Committee expects that such approvals will only be granted on an exceptional basis and limited to circumstances where a bank is prevented from meeting these conditions because of implementation decisions of supervisors of the bank’s subsidiary operations in other (foreign) jurisdictions.
Despite the relative brevity of the Operational Risk section the Accord, the source material for risk mitigation is wide and deep indeed. The following is a brief list of some of the current Basel guidelines dealing with various aspects of operational risk.
Mobile Manners
The mobile phone has become ubiquitous. It is the one hi-tech device that has become the universal calling card for humankind. Yet despite the privilege and the benefits that this instrument bestows it has turned many folk into rude bores bereft of any manners in their slavish obedience to this twenty-first century icon.Is the Financial Crisis Really Over?
To really fix the financial and banking system governments and regulators need to get to the core of the problems that led to the 2007-9 financial crisis. The evidence so far indicates that the current approach has failed and that throwing money at banks is not a part of the solution. Unless the authorities can get the “fix” right we are facing ongoing crisis as banks revert to their old ways with little regard for anyone but themselves.Mobile Payments & Remittances – Dangers Ahead
The use of the mobile phone for the transfer of workers’ remittances and for small payments holds much promise, especially in Africa. However two problematic issues threaten the mobile revolution. These are the attitude of the banks to their prospective clients and the attitude of bank regulators to non-bank participants.