The cohesive gel implant, often referred to as the "Gummy Bear" implant, is generating significant interest among American women seeking breast augmentation. Despite not yet receiving unrestricted approval from the FDA, this innovative implant is poised to revolutionize the field of cosmetic surgery.
Cohesive gel implants are a type of silicone breast implant filled with a thicker, more stable silicone gel. This consistency gives them a unique feel and shape, often compared to the popular Gummy Bear candy. Unlike traditional silicone or saline implants, cohesive gel implants maintain their shape even when cut in half, providing a more natural look and feel.
As of now, the FDA has not granted unrestricted approval for cohesive gel implants in the United States. However, they are available through clinical trials. Women interested in these implants must find an FDA-approved surgeon participating in these trials. The process involves rigorous follow-up appointments over ten years, but the government may reimburse the cost of the surgery.
One of the most compelling features of cohesive gel implants is their natural feel. Traditional silicone implants are firmer, while saline implants can feel like water balloons. Cohesive gel implants, however, mimic the consistency of natural breast tissue, offering a more realistic feel.
Cohesive gel implants are less likely to rupture compared to their saline and traditional silicone counterparts. Even if the outer shell breaks, the gel inside remains intact, reducing the risk of leakage and complications.
These implants are preformed into an anatomical shape, resembling the natural slope of a breast. This design ensures that the implants maintain their shape regardless of the body's position, providing a consistent and natural appearance.
Cohesive gel implants are currently the most expensive option on the market. The price could increase further depending on the outcomes of ongoing FDA clinical trials. Any additional research and development costs will likely be passed on to consumers.
Due to their solid gel composition, cohesive gel implants require larger incisions for insertion. This can lead to more noticeable scarring compared to saline or traditional silicone implants.
Currently, cohesive gel implants are only available in an anatomical shape. While this offers a natural look, it limits options for women who may prefer a different aesthetic.
Cohesive gel implants offer a promising future for breast augmentation, combining a natural feel with reduced risks. While FDA approval is still pending, the growing interest and positive early data suggest that these implants could soon become the preferred choice for many American women. For those interested, consulting an FDA-approved surgeon participating in clinical trials is the best way to explore this innovative option.
For more information on breast augmentation and cohesive gel implants, visit the American Society of Plastic Surgeons and the FDA's official website.
Sources:
Cohesive Gel Implants: The Future of Breast Augmentation in the U.S.
Cohesive gel implants, also known as "Gummy Bear Implants," are on the verge of becoming widely available in the United States. These implants have been accessible in Europe and other parts of the world for over two decades, and they are now undergoing rigorous clinical trials by the FDA. This article delves into the specifics of cohesive gel implants, their benefits, and the current state of their approval in the U.S.Can A Woman Be Too Old For Breast Augmentation Surgery?
Regardless of age, women can consider breast augmentation surgery. Surprisingly, age does not determine whether someone is an ideal candidate for this procedure. This article delves into the nuances of breast augmentation for older women, exploring the factors that make someone a suitable candidate and debunking common myths.Effective Solutions for Reducing Breast Size
Many women dream of enhancing their bust size, but a significant number seek the opposite: smaller breasts. This article delves into the reasons behind this desire and explores two primary solutions for breast reduction.