The Function Of A Tax Fraud Lawyer

It is surprising just how many people try to escape their duty to pay tax to the federal government each year. Anyone found doing this is committing an offence under the tax laws of the United States. Evading tax is considered a very serious offence in every country as this affects the running of a government and perpetrators are dealt with severely. These types of offences are termed as white-collar crimes in legal circles, as ordinary citizens with no previous criminal record usually commit these crimes.

The term Tax Fraud covers all the crimes relating to tax that has not been paid for whatever reason, even for those who are just late in submitting their tax returns. Anyone accused of this crime will probably hire a tax fraud lawyer to represent their interests.

Tax fraud lawyers have only one function and are not used for advice on how to plan for future tax commitments. If you require their services then either the worst is about to happen and you suspect the IRS are investigating you or they have concluded their work and have charged you with tax fraud offences.
On many occasions, a tax fraud lawyer is used merely as a negotiating tool to lessen the chances of a prison sentence and to find ways that outstanding tax debts can be paid.

Strangely, not all cases of tax fraud are carried out with intent to defraud the government but are done in ignorance of tax laws. The situation can also be the result of poor advice from a tax consultant which is normally able to be rectified.

While this can be used as mitigating circumstances hey will still be held responsible but it is more likely that charges will be dropped or reduced. It should go without saying that only advisers who are accredited should be employed with such an important matter, especially when negotiating with the Internal Revenue Service.

The normal approach by a tax fraud lawyer will be too reason the argument that prosecuting the individual or company will not serve the public interest as recovery of the taxes owed is less likely. When this line of reasoning is well presented, the authorities might settle for a compromise by accepting payments in installments or waiving off a part of the tax dues instead of prosecuting them.