As companies start applications development to satisfy business needs, a number of requirements to a mobile platform come out, which are to be met by Mobile developers. Most critical of the requirements are as follows
1. Desktop application integration. This includes accurate data synchronization with encryption and the possibility to manage data offline. If you need timely access to important data stored on your desktop, including e-mails, event alerts, and customer data, than proper integration is a must.
2. Multi-tasking. Due to a limited character of mobile device resources, multi-tasking is one of the key ways to increase productivity. (Though it's okay for Windows Mobile developers, this may be an issue for iPhone or Android developers.)
3. Minimization of traffic amount between a server and a mobile device, which contributes to time and cost savings.
4. User-friendly interface that allows accomplishing necessary tasks by fewer operations.
5. The last, but not the least of requirements is lower total cost of ownership (TCO) and support costs. Implementation of a mobile platform across the enterprise must be estimated by mobile developers beforehand and such factors, as support and upgrade costs, are of importance, as well.
Each platform provider offers its own mobile solutions to satisfy these requirements. Microsoft, for instance, is getting prepared for Windows Mobile 7 launch long anticipated by .NET mobile developers. Google, on the other hand, armed with the forthcoming Google Nexus One, is trying to compete by incorporating Android with existing Google Apps, such as Google Docs, Gmail, Google Calendar, and other. Apple puts emphasis on business features, providing integration with MS Exchange, as well as data encryption, GPS, etc.
However, according to Evans Data survey, Windows Mobile development is still dominant in comparison with RIM OS, Mac OS, and Android development. 50 percent of mobile developers are targeting either Windows Mobile 6.0 or Windows Mobile 5.0 platforms. The reasons why the number of businesses operating on Windows Mobile is overwhelming include the following:
Apart from Outlook integration, Windows Mobile offers such Microsoft Office Mobile applications, as Excel Mobile, PowerPoint Mobile, and Word Mobile. These applications have gained so much popularity that they are universally implemented across various industries.
The TCO of the Windows Mobile platform is 15-24% lower than that of the RIM Blackberry platform over a three-year period. And there's nothing to be surprised at, since the native support of Exchange ActiveSync removes the need to invest in additional software, integration efforts, or hiring extra mobile developers.
Window s Mobile, being a .NET-based platform, gives users a possibility to gain all advantages of Microsoft Office and other Microsoft-based applications.
Though being sometimes criticized for its clumsy user interface, Windows Mobile, compared to other mobile platforms, is, to the maximum extent, a business-oriented technology, which is, naturally, determined by the marketing strategy of Microsoft, concerning Windows Mobile development. The good thing about it all is competition that drives all of these platform providers to new enhancements and innovations, which will help better satisfy the mentioned requirements and will eliminate unnecessary mobile developers' workaround.
AIR and Prism: Two Ways for a Flex Developer to Create Desktop Applications
Can a Flex developer use her/his Web development skills to build desktop applications? A few years ago the very question would have provoked genuine amusement. Disregarding the proficiency of a Flex developer, desktop and Web application development require different sets of skills, different programming techniques, and often make use of different technologies altogether. At least, that had been the case before new technologies, such as Adobe AIR and Mozilla Prism, were introduced, enabling AJAX or Adobe Flex developer to create desktop applications without having to leave Web skills behind.The Philosophy of Rails Developers
Launching a Web 2.0 project, ISVs are deeply concerned about the scope of their venture, as well as profitability. Facing the overwhelming choice of an appropriate Web technology, ISVs may get confused. What kind of a development team is to be employed for their type of project, Silverlight, Adobe Flex, Java FX, Rails developers, or any other?