Widespread English Illiteracy Hurts Everyone: How Can We End It?

Oct 20
08:54

2009

Bob C. Cleckler

Bob C. Cleckler

  • Share this article on Facebook
  • Share this article on Twitter
  • Share this article on Linkedin

At long last, Tom and Amy moved into their own apartment. They previously lived in a homeless shelter which consisted of cots in a large open room. Th...

mediaimage
At long last,Widespread English Illiteracy Hurts Everyone: How Can We End It? Articles Tom and Amy moved into their own apartment. They previously lived in a homeless shelter which consisted of cots in a large open room. Their three-year-old son could find no place to play and was considered a nuisance by the others at the shelter. Their new apartment was the only low-rent apartment in the area and was barely within their ability to pay because of Tom's low-wage job. One very cold January day, only one year after moving in, the apartment owner gave them an eviction notice. He said the crying of their new baby disturbed the others in the apartment house, a forbidden act in their rental contract. The rental contract did not really mentioned this. The apartment owner planned to improve the apartment and charge an amount he knew that Tom and Amy could not afford. Neither Tom nor Amy could read, and they did not dare challenge the apartment owner fearing exposure of their illiteracy to several of the friends they had made at the apartment house. Instead, they meekly gathered up their meager belongings and moved back into the homeless shelter.

These and hundreds of similar "horror stories" occur all around us every day. Illiterates constantly encounter problems which we would consider catastrophic, if they occurred to us. Some of the problems, such as taking prescription medicines when they cannot read the medicine label, are potentially life-threatening. Most of these problems occur without our knowledge because of the extremely good hiding abilities of functional illiterates. They must constantly endure at least thirty-four different kinds of serious physical, mental, emotional, medical, and financial problems. Illiterates experience the difficulty or impossibility of many simple, necessary daily tasks that we take for granted.

The most accurate study of United States illiteracy of adults ever commissioned by the U.S. government, statistically balanced to represent the entire U.S. population, (search for "Adult Literacy in America" for the shocking illiteracy statistics) shows that 31.2 percent of the two least literate of the five literacy groups determined in the study were in poverty. Only 10.1 percent of the three most literate groups were in poverty. Since the only provable differences between the two groupings was their literacy level, this strongly indicates that the least literate groups were at least twice as likely to live in poverty as a result of their illiteracy as for all other reasons combined. Shockingly, the two least literate groups amounted to 48.7 percent of U.S. adults.

We do not see 48.7 percent of U.S. adults in poverty because most households have more than one employed adult and because low-income households receive financial assistance from the government (from our taxes) and from family, friends, and charities. The report of a study done by the same group who did the above 1993 study came out in 2006 showing no statistically significant improvement over the 1993 results.

According to a 2009 study by the management consulting firm McKinsey & Co., the gap between the academic achievement levels for the U.S. and better-performing nations knocked as much as $2.3 trillion off the gross domestic product of the U.S. in 2008. Thomas Friedman's book, The World is Flat, details many ways in which previously American jobs are now going overseas; more literate workers in other nations makes the competition for jobs much more serious for the U.S. Today's U.S. companies must spend more money for recruiting and training than before. Functional illiteracy eliminates many job applicants from consideration.

Benefits of Ending Illiteracy

  • You will benefit emotionally if you become concerned about the functional illiteracy of people you know and love.
  • You will benefit if you object to an average personal cost of $5186 each year as a result of illiteracy for (1) taxes for government programs that illiterates use and for the truancy, juvenile delinquency, and crime directly related to illiteracy and (2) higher prices for consumer goods due to illiterates in the workplace.
  • You will benefit if you accept employment by -- or maintain financial interests in -- a business or organization in which you invest time or money. Illiteracy affects all organizations to some extent, some of them seriously.
  • You will benefit if our nation improves the trade balance, national relationships, and our national employment by improving communication between nations.

The Solution to Illiteracy

Linguists tell us that Dr. Johnson made a very serious linguistic error in preparing his dictionary in 1755. Instead of freezing the spelling of the sounds of the English language, he froze the spelling of words. Present-day English is thus based upon the spelling of words from the languages of eight nations who occupied the British Isles before 1755 and "borrowed" words (and usually their spelling) from 350 other languages since then.

Professor Julius Nyikos found 1768 ways of spelling forty sounds in English! There's not even one invariable spelling rule in English -- some of the exceptions have exceptions! As a result, every word in a person's vocabulary must be learned, one at a time, either by rote memory or by repeated use.

The obvious solution: spell our words the way they sound, as the rest of alphabetic languages of the world do! If students are taught a perfectly phonetic spelling system, they only need to learn the spelling of 38 sounds instead of all 20,000 or more words in their reading vocabulary. It is so simple that present readers of English can learn a perfectly phonetic spelling in about five minutes. And with the exception of the most seriously mentally handicapped, a perfectly phonetic spelling system can be learned in as little as a week to as much as three months by all five-years-old or older beginning readers .

Like U.S. illiteracy, world illiteracy of English-speaking people is also much worse than you may realize. Adoption of NuEnglish will enable about 600 million of the 1.3 billion people around the world who speak English but cannot read it very well -- over 93 million in the U.S. alone -- to learn to read English in less than three months. Without adoption of a perfectly phonetic spelling system, based upon present statistics, less than two percent of U.S. adult illiterates will ever become fluent readers.

Consider these facts about spelling reform:

  • Dozens of scholars for over 250 years have recommended it.
  • Several nations, smaller and larger than the U.S., both advanced and third-world, have simplified their spelling.
  • A simpler spelling system has been *proven* effective for making learning to read easier in more than 300 alphabetic languages -- but never tried in English. In 295 languages (at least 98% of them) students become fluent readers in less than three months. Most of the approx. 51 percent of U.S. adults who do become functionally literate require two to four *years.*
  • Several distinguished linguists and educators have thoroughly debunked all reasonable objections to spelling reform.
  • The need is greater than ever in our increasingly complex world, and with improvements due to computer technology the change will be easier than ever, but it remains untried in English.

The simple, logical, easy-to-implement, proven-effective spelling system known as NuEnglish, is detailed in Wikipedia. Teaching reading to students and teaching reading fluency is easy with a perfectly phonetic spelling system, such as NuEnglish. A book which details the causes of illiteracy, shows how a perfectly phonetic spelling system can easily be adopted into use, and answers all objections to doing so with rigorous, infallible proof is listed below.